everytime when lecturer's meeting complaint about why they are so many people fail on your subject to another lecturer that responsible.....he'll answered "well, that's not my problem because there were really GOOD at PLAGIARISM", that's one of the reason.......itu tak dapat dinafikan ada yang berlaku....but the other things is in student's perspective why they fail where students selalu cakap yang saya dah hafal satu buku tapi satu pun tak keluar....what's wrong????herm saya dah baca topic2 yang saya rasa bakal keluar tapi takda satu pun ramalan saya kuar kat exam....then one day someone that have graduated and become one of the lecturer in the same U,he said that our student nie dah lama dah ikut sistem what he called as relying on other material rather than he/she's own BRAIN, what they learn is not to apply but to memorize....asal dapat hafal blehla....watpa nak faham konsep???sistem dimana kita dibagi satu buku,then we copy it to our brain....basically dari kindergarden lagi pun.....amalan SUAP-MENYUAP, so the end product also minta suap kat mana-mana,leh kerana kat sekolah dulu cikgu yang suapkan,kaU U plak lecturer ajar tapi tak suap bayk sgt kena cari resources sendiri lau nak wat assignment, so "suap"la orang lain punya keja............itu lau dr segi wat assignment,lau dari segi learning style plak???also the same suap aja kat OtaK tue pa yang dibelajar.....exactly how we gonna end this type of learning???....dah lama kita asyik guna method yang sama...when it come to critical and anylisis thinking,then everybody pun bengong gan soalan yang diberi time tutorial....For example,WHY the King has pardon power while we have our judiciary body?????then nobody could give the answer.....everyone facing down...they only knew that the King has pardon power,appoint judges,Head of Religion,Head of military etc....but never say to themselves WHY????the question WHY??? is never ever consider as one of the part of thinking......apa yang tau HErm, what is the King's Position???as the Head of State...then,when King can be appoint??every 5 years......but never ask WHY the king only head of the state but not the head of Govt???why king appoint every 5 years not 6 or 7......looks like cepumas question but we never ever realise yang kita tak berapa ambi tau bnda2 cepumas nie.......this just one of the critical thinking that I've mention we should trained to ourselves.....The question about the King is not questioning the King's power but just an example nanti orang salah tafsir plak......so my question is DO U also know the answer about the King's power to pardon???herm If u do,then good.....lau kita tak pupuk budaya HOW...alamatnya time keja pun nanti main gak "SUAP-DISUAP" nie..
Top Commentators
Friday, August 14, 2009
stUdent kat Malaysia= mesiN fotostaT????
everytime when lecturer's meeting complaint about why they are so many people fail on your subject to another lecturer that responsible.....he'll answered "well, that's not my problem because there were really GOOD at PLAGIARISM", that's one of the reason.......itu tak dapat dinafikan ada yang berlaku....but the other things is in student's perspective why they fail where students selalu cakap yang saya dah hafal satu buku tapi satu pun tak keluar....what's wrong????herm saya dah baca topic2 yang saya rasa bakal keluar tapi takda satu pun ramalan saya kuar kat exam....then one day someone that have graduated and become one of the lecturer in the same U,he said that our student nie dah lama dah ikut sistem what he called as relying on other material rather than he/she's own BRAIN, what they learn is not to apply but to memorize....asal dapat hafal blehla....watpa nak faham konsep???sistem dimana kita dibagi satu buku,then we copy it to our brain....basically dari kindergarden lagi pun.....amalan SUAP-MENYUAP, so the end product also minta suap kat mana-mana,leh kerana kat sekolah dulu cikgu yang suapkan,kaU U plak lecturer ajar tapi tak suap bayk sgt kena cari resources sendiri lau nak wat assignment, so "suap"la orang lain punya keja............itu lau dr segi wat assignment,lau dari segi learning style plak???also the same suap aja kat OtaK tue pa yang dibelajar.....exactly how we gonna end this type of learning???....dah lama kita asyik guna method yang sama...when it come to critical and anylisis thinking,then everybody pun bengong gan soalan yang diberi time tutorial....For example,WHY the King has pardon power while we have our judiciary body?????then nobody could give the answer.....everyone facing down...they only knew that the King has pardon power,appoint judges,Head of Religion,Head of military etc....but never say to themselves WHY????the question WHY??? is never ever consider as one of the part of thinking......apa yang tau HErm, what is the King's Position???as the Head of State...then,when King can be appoint??every 5 years......but never ask WHY the king only head of the state but not the head of Govt???why king appoint every 5 years not 6 or 7......looks like cepumas question but we never ever realise yang kita tak berapa ambi tau bnda2 cepumas nie.......this just one of the critical thinking that I've mention we should trained to ourselves.....The question about the King is not questioning the King's power but just an example nanti orang salah tafsir plak......so my question is DO U also know the answer about the King's power to pardon???herm If u do,then good.....lau kita tak pupuk budaya HOW...alamatnya time keja pun nanti main gak "SUAP-DISUAP" nie..
If you like this post then consider sharing it with others.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment